Domain Specific Definition Psychology
Specific directions on how to behave during the research study hock 2009.
Domain specific definition psychology. Compare domain general ability. Domain specific learning theories of development hold that we have many independent specialized knowledge structures rather than one cohesive knowledge structure. Domain specificity is a theoretical position in cognitive science especially modern cognitive development that argues that many aspects of cognition are supported by specialized presumably evolutionarily specified learning devices. Over the years it has occurred to me that the primary argument for the domain specificity of ct i e.
A cognitive ability specific to doing task. Cognitive psychology was founded by ulric dick neisser in the late 1950s. Thus training in one domain may not impact another independent domain. The major domains of development are physical cognitive language and social emotional.
Social psychology is the scientific study of how people s thoughts feelings and behaviors are influenced by the actual imagined or implied presence of others. For example core knowledge theorists believe we have highly specialized functions that are independent of one another. Ct ability conceptualized as being specific to a particular area s stems from the simple. The social and personality psychology domain.
Evolutionary psychology evolutionary psychology domain specific mechanisms. When used in relation to human development the word domain refers to specific aspects of growth and change. Domain specificity is a theoretical position in cognitive science especially modern cognitive development that argues that many aspects of cognition are supported by specialized presumably evolutionarily specified learning devices. What does domain specific mean in cognitive psychology.
Evolutionarily informed research has suggested that brains are composed of a number of specialized domain specific mechanisms. Psychology definition of domain specific knowledge. The position is a close relative of modularity of mind but is considered more general in that it does not necessarily entail all the assumptions of fodorian. The position is a close relative of modularity of mind but is considered more general in that it does not necessarily entail all the assumptions of fodorian.